| Title |
Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000329.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez, Anne Lethaby, Rosalie J Fergusson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 157 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 63 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 62 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,361,279
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,745
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,785
of 451,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.