↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Walking for hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
150 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Walking for hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008823.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ling Ling Lee, Caroline A Mulvaney, Yoko Kin Yoke Wong, Edwin SY Chan, Michael C Watson, Hui Hsin Lin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 150 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 21%
Student > Bachelor 9 19%
Unspecified 6 13%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 27%
Unspecified 6 13%
Sports and Recreations 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 7 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2021.
All research outputs
#252,423
of 17,679,473 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#512
of 11,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,255
of 301,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,679,473 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.