↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Urinary catheter policies for long‐term bladder drainage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Urinary catheter policies for long‐term bladder drainage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004201.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara S Niël‐Weise, Peterhans J van den Broek, Edina MK da Silva, Laercio A Silva

Abstract

People requiring long-term bladder draining commonly experience catheter-associated urinary tract infection and other problems.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 1%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 185 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 14%
Other 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 57 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 10%
Psychology 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 64 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,135,301
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,763
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,964
of 186,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.