| Title |
Urinary catheter policies for long‐term bladder drainage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004201.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barbara S Niël‐Weise, Peterhans J van den Broek, Edina MK da Silva, Laercio A Silva |
| Abstract |
People requiring long-term bladder draining commonly experience catheter-associated urinary tract infection and other problems. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 181 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 53 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 11% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 60 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,135,301
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,763
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,964
of 186,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.