↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
35 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
350 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009260.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian Reichow, Erin E Barton, Brian A Boyd, Kara Hume

Abstract

The rising prevalence of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) increases the need for evidence-based behavioral treatments to lessen the impact of symptoms on children's functioning. At present, there are no curative or psychopharmacological therapies to effectively treat all symptoms of the disorder. Early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI), a treatment based on the principles of applied behavior analysis delivered for multiple years at an intensity of 20 to 40 hours per week, is one of the more well-established treatments for ASD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Canada 3 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 369 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 19%
Researcher 54 14%
Student > Bachelor 48 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Other 69 18%
Unknown 69 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 95 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 84 22%
Social Sciences 35 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 7%
Neuroscience 16 4%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 78 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2021.
All research outputs
#617,120
of 25,387,480 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,135
of 12,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,353
of 188,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.