↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions in the workplace to support breastfeeding for women in employment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interventions in the workplace to support breastfeeding for women in employment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006177.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Omar A Abdulwadud, Mary Elizabeth Snow

Abstract

In recent years there has been a rise in the participation rate of women in employment. Some may become pregnant while in employment and subsequently deliver their babies. Most may decide to return early to work after giving birth for various reasons. Unless these mothers get support from their employers and fellow employees, they might give up breastfeeding when they return to work. As a result, the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding to the recommended age of the babies would be affected.Workplace environment can play a positive role to promote breastfeeding. For women going back to work, various types of workplace support interventions are available and this should not be ignored by employers. Notably, promoting breastfeeding in a workplace may have benefits for the women, the baby and also the employer.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 118 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 17%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 34%
Social Sciences 19 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 15%
Psychology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 23 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,411,712
of 15,565,939 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,753
of 11,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,009
of 149,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,565,939 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.