↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for tobacco use prevention in Indigenous youth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for tobacco use prevention in Indigenous youth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009325.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin V Carson, Malcolm P Brinn, Nadina A Labiszewski, Matthew Peters, Anne B Chang, Antony Veale, Adrian J Esterman, Brian J Smith

Abstract

Tobacco use in Indigenous populations (people who have inhabited a country for thousands of years) is often double that in the non-Indigenous population. Addiction to nicotine usually begins during early adolescence and young people who reach the age of 18 as non-smokers are unlikely to become smokers thereafter. Indigenous youth in particular commence smoking at an early age, and a disproportionate burden of substance-related morbidity and mortality exists as a result.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 162 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 25%
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Other 8 5%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 30 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 25%
Psychology 23 14%
Social Sciences 20 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 38 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2014.
All research outputs
#1,811,982
of 17,361,274 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,386
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,427
of 155,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,361,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.