↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for tobacco use prevention in Indigenous youth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for tobacco use prevention in Indigenous youth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009325.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin V Carson, Malcolm P Brinn, Nadina A Labiszewski, Matthew Peters, Anne B Chang, Antony Veale, Adrian J Esterman, Brian J Smith

Abstract

Tobacco use in Indigenous populations (people who have inhabited a country for thousands of years) is often double that in the non-Indigenous population. Addiction to nicotine usually begins during early adolescence and young people who reach the age of 18 as non-smokers are unlikely to become smokers thereafter. Indigenous youth in particular commence smoking at an early age, and a disproportionate burden of substance-related morbidity and mortality exists as a result.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 213 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 19%
Researcher 31 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Other 10 5%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 58 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 21%
Psychology 29 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 12%
Social Sciences 23 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 72 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,384,062
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,863
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,251
of 186,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#77
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.