↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hyperbaric oxygen for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
12 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
Title
Hyperbaric oxygen for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004739.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael H Bennett, Tom Kertesz, Matthias Perleth, Philip Yeung, Jan P Lehm

Abstract

This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 1, 2005 and previously updated in 2007 and 2009.Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) is common and has a significant effect on quality of life. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) may improve oxygen supply to the inner ear and result in an improvement in hearing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 203 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 13%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Other 15 7%
Other 48 23%
Unknown 54 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 46%
Psychology 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 59 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,528,619
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,262
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,729
of 193,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.