↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Venom immunotherapy for preventing allergic reactions to insect stings

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Venom immunotherapy for preventing allergic reactions to insect stings
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008838.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert J Boyle, Mariam Elremeli, Juliet Hockenhull, Mary Gemma Cherry, Max K Bulsara, Michael Daniels, J.N.G. Oude Elberink

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Tunisia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 230 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 9%
Researcher 19 8%
Other 17 7%
Other 46 20%
Unknown 73 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Psychology 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 86 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,885,121
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,519
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,325
of 194,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.