↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for bacterial folliculitis and boils (furuncles and carbuncles)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for bacterial folliculitis and boils (furuncles and carbuncles)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013099.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huang-Shen Lin, Pei-Tzu Lin, Yu-Shiun Tsai, Shu-Hui Wang, Ching-Chi Chi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 13 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Psychology 3 9%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 15 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,200,012
of 18,943,833 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,776
of 11,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,770
of 311,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,943,833 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.