↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012827.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ralph F Staerkle, Fabian Lunger, Lukas Fink, Tom Sasse, Martin Lacher, Erik von Elm, Ahmed I Marwan, Stefan Holland-Cunz, Raphael Nicolas Vuille-Dit-Bille

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 4%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 62 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Unspecified 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 67 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,299,771
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,786
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,198
of 452,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#74
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.