| Title |
COVID‐19 and its cardiovascular effects: a systematic review of prevalence studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013879 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pierpaolo Pellicori, Gemina Doolub, Chih Mun Wong, Keng Siang Lee, Kenneth Mangion, Mahmood Ahmad, Colin Berry, Iain Squire, Pier D Lambiase, Alexander Lyon, Alex McConnachie, Rod S Taylor, John Gf Cleland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 15% |
| Spain | 11 | 11% |
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| Dominican Republic | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 77 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 17% |
| Scientists | 5 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 486 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 486 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 10% |
| Researcher | 33 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 71 | 15% |
| Unknown | 229 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 131 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 40 | 8% |
| Unknown | 241 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2023.
All research outputs
#238,345
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#401
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,286
of 452,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.