RT @dokhollidays: @dokhollidays Addendum Hier mal eine @cochranecollab Arbeit zur Evidenz von Chiropraktik: https://t.co/FyVRiLZ92j http…
@dokhollidays Addendum Hier mal eine @cochranecollab Arbeit zur Evidenz von Chiropraktik: https://t.co/FyVRiLZ92j https://t.co/xtc6PRKQzi
@jemapellesandri @leandroneko se da certo pra vc pode continuar, mas vou deixar uma revisão aqui sobre o assunto https://t.co/zWXa0x4iHS
@fcwhg @insolitejeu @DocAmine_ Il me semblait pourtant avoir partagé des RCT et revues de littérature. En voici deux autre autour desquelles nous pouvons échanger : https://t.co/I1yHGMvFeP
@NaanDerthaal @IMMT5280 And there are high quality studies that show no difference. https://t.co/1E92HwxhTR
@NaanDerthaal @IMMT5280 Here is a review from 2011 https://t.co/1E92HwxhTR
Algunas fuentes: https://t.co/otUC408Iq0 https://t.co/g2BoXkVDAb https://t.co/jYQcC1g8ap
@DrBuckD True and also acknowledged in the work and the OP. Still its not exactly a ringing endorsement of MT either, and other work is similarly inconclusive. I.e. it may or may not work for some people. Not the effective cure it is advertised as by many.
@SCARRRRRRRRRRR1 @KenjiFisio @FalleNCS Quebrar pescoço, não. Mas quiropraxia é pseudoterapia. Serve pra nada. https://t.co/6FmX4Tg9NY https://t.co/DUbrOYOyF0
@BBQForMyFamily @adalustlace @DrWomanhattan Most medical procedures have benefits which justify the risks. Chiropractic adjustment has struggled to demonstrate any: https://t.co/6OzwC9YeNQ, https://t.co/lysfJ3fQUH
@MxVivianWulf @_SJPeace_ There's a Cochrane Review that disagrees with that assessment. Personally, I would see a chiropractor, but there is some evidence of effectiveness. https://t.co/YxGAhFyPj3
@JohnHopkins_ @theSamParr The results of this review demonstrate that SMT appears to be as effective as other common therapies prescribed for chronic low-back pain, such as, exercise therapy, standard medical care or physiotherapy. https://t.co/r6PCNmmTmX
RT @DrHowieMell: @NickFalacci @tacoemoji_Not @Neurofourier There is absolutely zero evidence for this claim. Several major neutrally funded…
@NickFalacci @tacoemoji_Not @Neurofourier There is absolutely zero evidence for this claim. Several major neutrally funded meta-analyses show no benefit to chiropractic for acute or chronic low back pain. https://t.co/ohTjcL1Lf2 https://t.co/mFdU9fCPUt h
@Rbodker Jeg er muligvis ikke opdateret, men peger evidensen ikke på, at kiropraktisk er lige så godt/dårligt som alt andet mod lænderygsmerter?🤔 Det er muligvis også det, du mener😅 https://t.co/tBjXxhKD49
Por ejemplo en este estudio de Cochrane, se demuestra que es igual de útil que otras terapias manuales o que el ejercicio terapéutico, para el dolor de espalda. https://t.co/qZDX3zk3HF
Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain https://t.co/HDVQPdud0k
@ValdesL2 Esto, por ejemplo. https://t.co/atIacwaUKl O esto: https://t.co/i6QKbgNBAT Esto también: https://t.co/lF5orGvhn8
RT @mjdelrio: @santibjrcooper @SandraSaFer Toma, una revisión sistemática. https://t.co/atIacwaUKl
@santibjrcooper @SandraSaFer Toma, una revisión sistemática. https://t.co/atIacwaUKl
@barbaradetienda si lees mi primer tweet, digo “se considera” por personas mucho más hábiles que yo. no confirmo “que lo sea” ya que no hay evidencia que lo respalde por si solo. como en esta revisión bibliográfica: https://t.co/fI8zSSlShu o aquí: https:/
慢性腰痛に対する脊椎手技療法 | Cochrane https://t.co/Wpnx0sInOF
High quality evidence suggests that there is no clinically relevant difference between SMT and other interventions for reducing pain and improving function in patients with chronic low-back pain. https://t.co/uqeMGh8LPE
@HomegrownJoan @david_colquhoun @CaulfieldTim @CoyneoftheRealm @SkepticsGuide @gorskon My job is to assess the quality of medical claims as an expert in clinical epidemiology and knowledge translation. There is a lack of good evidence supporting most thera
RT @JMestreFisio: @fisiopadros @david_kinect Me baso en este tipo de literatura: 1. https://t.co/scCKowB9O5 2. https://t.co/F1uAvTxRJl 3.…
@fisiopadros @david_kinect Me baso en este tipo de literatura: 1. https://t.co/scCKowB9O5 2. https://t.co/F1uAvTxRJl 3. https://t.co/JzLn045RO1
@fan2physio J'ai pour la lombalgie aigue de Cochrane (la Meta est déjà faite 😅) https://t.co/njqCRxZ71f Et chronique https://t.co/XSC3WhnwAS Mais c'est uniquement les manœuvres "qui font craquer" et ça a >5 ans. Et pas sur les radiculalgies
脊椎手技療法(SMT)について患者に聞かれたけど、効果のほどがよくわからない。 https://t.co/FR0lCeXA21
RT @TheSGEM: @drrinde @DrJenGunter Number of published trials does not mean chiropractic therapy works. Here is a SRMA https://t.co/0mHvAK…
RT @TheSGEM: @drrinde @DrJenGunter Number of published trials does not mean chiropractic therapy works. Here is a SRMA https://t.co/0mHvAK…
RT @TheSGEM: @drrinde @DrJenGunter Number of published trials does not mean chiropractic therapy works. Here is a SRMA https://t.co/0mHvAK…
RT @TheSGEM: @drrinde @DrJenGunter Number of published trials does not mean chiropractic therapy works. Here is a SRMA https://t.co/0mHvAK…
RT @TheSGEM: @drrinde @DrJenGunter Number of published trials does not mean chiropractic therapy works. Here is a SRMA https://t.co/0mHvAK…
RT @TheSGEM: @drrinde @DrJenGunter Number of published trials does not mean chiropractic therapy works. Here is a SRMA https://t.co/0mHvAK…
@drrinde @DrJenGunter Number of published trials does not mean chiropractic therapy works. Here is a SRMA https://t.co/0mHvAK13vJ "...not statistically significantly more effective than inert interventions or sham..." "statistically significant but not cl
@picardonhealth @GlobeDebate @ONChiroAssoc No good evidence of efficacy. https://t.co/0mHvAK13vJ
@mkeulemans @deLijfarts @NOS Deze is wat nieuwer 😀 https://t.co/ORteMmK56h
RT @cescept: @MariaJose_Quero @JulioBasulto_DN @MujerLucida No, la osteopatía no ha demostrado eficacia. https://t.co/CqFvE9HthV
RT @cescept: @MariaJose_Quero @JulioBasulto_DN @MujerLucida No, la osteopatía no ha demostrado eficacia. https://t.co/CqFvE9HthV
@MariaJose_Quero @JulioBasulto_DN @MujerLucida No, la osteopatía no ha demostrado eficacia. https://t.co/CqFvE9HthV
@AssedBaig re: independence. Data is data. Only way to objectively interpret is open systematic review eg. Cochrane https://t.co/HQioiJ1NxW
RT @AdamMeakins: @timonealpt @DrDunning @FirasMourad I'll see ur small poorly designed trial, and raise a Cochrane SR #RoyalFlush http://t.…
RT @AdamMeakins: @timonealpt @DrDunning @FirasMourad I'll see ur small poorly designed trial, and raise a Cochrane SR #RoyalFlush http://t.…
@timonealpt @DrDunning @FirasMourad I'll see ur small poorly designed trial, and raise a Cochrane SR #RoyalFlush http://t.co/NjTKGHBLxG
RT @Gardensafari: @smperle Cochrane review: http://t.co/GekB9DZics
RT @Gardensafari: @smperle Cochrane review: http://t.co/GekB9DZics
@smperle Cochrane review: http://t.co/GekB9DZics
#cochrane review on spinal manipulation for #back pain @cochranecollab @CochraneLibrary http://t.co/KZvHvwZnjD
Joint mobilisation & manipulation no better than sham for acute & chronic low back pain http://t.co/60M00G8RbX http://t.co/y0uwfjB2Az
Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain http://t.co/hUEOtCEl6l
Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain http://t.co/hUEOtCEl6l
Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain http://t.co/hUEOtCEl6l
Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain http://t.co/hUEOtCEl6l
Chiropractic appears to be no better or worse than other existing therapies for chronic low-back pain. http://t.co/fJl5CNpQ #chirot
@Thinking_Chiro But chiro can't recommended for it because of +++chiroquackery and other options being available http://t.co/sYnG0ud3T2
@adewagstaff @NeilOConnell @PhysioMACP @SeanPCase a really good one... http://t.co/mNUbZGNgUk
@jonasgahrstore Da ble du lurt. Der er ingen evidens for at kiropraktikk forebygger muskel- og skjelletplager. http://t.co/yDUrfUgu
@Blue_Wode IMO no proper evidence for efficacy of any SMT. Mortality been described. http://t.co/AlBhwOZl http://t.co/UQ59MDdS #chiropractic
RT @MathewHawkes: @SP_Physio think it's this one: http://t.co/7GIT6qtD
RT @MathewHawkes: @SP_Physio think it's this one: http://t.co/7GIT6qtD
@aptaim @pgimmo Cochrane is hardly convincing http://t.co/SVi4dDeX I just took up running and did core exercises - #chucknorrisstyle
@CiViX De har konkludert med det samme før. Gjelder vel både nakke og korsrygg, kroniske og akutte smerter. http://t.co/CuviwWmC @OurKidX
@lianhua "appears to be no better or worse than other existing therapies for patients with chronic low-back pain" http://t.co/cZkhBHtW
Chiropractic appears to be no better or worse than other existing therapies for chronic low-back pain. http://t.co/J3zJcU4N #chirot
Chiropractic appears to be no better or worse than other existing therapies for chronic low-back pain. http://t.co/fJl5CNpQ #chirot
Back pain treatment. Little difference between methods including manips/mobs. Only 9 of 26 studies were Unbiased. http://t.co/1v26LnOR