↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013513.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lee-Yee Chong, Patorn Piromchai, Steve Sharp, Kornkiat Snidvongs, Katie E Webster, Carl Philpott, Claire Hopkins, Martin J Burton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 129 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Master 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 6 5%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 61 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Psychology 5 4%
Unspecified 5 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 63 49%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,484,620
of 21,173,213 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,518
of 12,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,077
of 373,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,173,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.