↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Zinc supplementation for improving pregnancy and infant outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
22 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
Title
Zinc supplementation for improving pregnancy and infant outcome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000230.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bianca Carducci, Emily C Keats, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 332 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 11%
Student > Master 27 8%
Researcher 25 8%
Other 19 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 5%
Other 51 15%
Unknown 155 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 11%
Unspecified 11 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 36 11%
Unknown 157 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,198,985
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,454
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,020
of 457,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.