↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Homeopathic medicines for adverse effects of cancer treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
twitter
106 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Homeopathic medicines for adverse effects of cancer treatments
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004845.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sosie Kassab, Mike Cummings, Saul Berkovitz, Robbert van Haselen, Peter Fisher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 287 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 47 16%
Student > Master 34 12%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 8%
Other 22 7%
Other 70 24%
Unknown 65 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 5%
Psychology 12 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 76 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 201. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2022.
All research outputs
#195,722
of 25,390,203 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#337
of 12,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#399
of 105,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.