↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Homeopathic medicines for adverse effects of cancer treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
twitter
118 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Homeopathic medicines for adverse effects of cancer treatments
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004845.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sosie Kassab, Mike Cummings, Saul Berkovitz, Robbert van Haselen, Peter Fisher

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 118 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 241 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 18%
Student > Master 31 12%
Student > Bachelor 30 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Other 21 8%
Other 66 27%
Unknown 33 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 7%
Psychology 11 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 40 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 206. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#102,558
of 17,630,293 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#196
of 11,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,662
of 333,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,630,293 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.