| Title |
Electrical conductance for the detection of dental caries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd014547 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Macey, Tanya Walsh, Philip Riley, Anne-Marie Glenny, Helen V Worthington, Janet E Clarkson, David Ricketts |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Chile | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 147 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 70 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 73 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,959,397
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,347
of 12,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,072
of 427,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.