↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Electrical conductance for the detection of dental caries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Electrical conductance for the detection of dental caries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014547
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Macey, Tanya Walsh, Philip Riley, Anne-Marie Glenny, Helen V Worthington, Janet E Clarkson, David Ricketts

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 162 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 8 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 79 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 83 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,202,038
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,622
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,618
of 454,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.