↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Electrical conductance for the detection of dental caries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Electrical conductance for the detection of dental caries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014547
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Macey, Tanya Walsh, Philip Riley, Anne-Marie Glenny, Helen V Worthington, Janet E Clarkson, David Ricketts

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 134 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Unspecified 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 6 4%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 55 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 29%
Unspecified 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 57 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,892,506
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,199
of 12,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,108
of 424,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#72
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.