The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Aromatherapy for pain management in labour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009215 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caroline A Smith, Carmel T Collins, Caroline A Crowther |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 533 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Malawi | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 525 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 93 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 84 | 16% |
| Researcher | 47 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 6% |
| Other | 91 | 17% |
| Unknown | 146 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 131 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 112 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 4% |
| Psychology | 23 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 68 | 13% |
| Unknown | 155 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,400,921
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,943
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,833
of 128,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.