| Title |
Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001561.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shah Ebrahim, Fiona Taylor, Kirsten Ward, Andrew Beswick, Margaret Burke, George Davey Smith |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 696 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 1% |
| Unknown | 666 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 101 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 87 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 82 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 78 | 11% |
| Other | 45 | 6% |
| Other | 171 | 25% |
| Unknown | 132 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 261 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 69 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 51 | 7% |
| Psychology | 47 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 4% |
| Other | 87 | 13% |
| Unknown | 156 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2022.
All research outputs
#859,797
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,747
of 12,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,121
of 190,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.