↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
253 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
613 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001561.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shah Ebrahim, Fiona Taylor, Kirsten Ward, Andrew Beswick, Margaret Burke, George Davey Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 613 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 583 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 96 16%
Student > Master 86 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 12%
Student > Bachelor 75 12%
Other 43 7%
Other 151 25%
Unknown 86 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 251 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 66 11%
Social Sciences 50 8%
Psychology 46 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 4%
Other 69 11%
Unknown 109 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#624,389
of 18,057,469 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,499
of 11,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,780
of 320,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,057,469 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.