The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Prognostic value of test(s) for O6‐methylguanine–DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation for predicting overall survival in people with glioblastoma treated with temozolomide
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013316.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexandra McAleenan, Claire Kelly, Francesca Spiga, Ashleigh Kernohan, Hung-Yuan Cheng, Sarah Dawson, Lena Schmidt, Tomos Robinson, Sebastian Brandner, Claire L Faulkner, Christopher Wragg, Sarah Jefferies, Amy Howell, Luke Vale, Julian P T Higgins, Kathreena M Kurian |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 75% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 133 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 54 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 26% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 58 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,125,271
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,532
of 13,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,356
of 457,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#125
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.