| Title |
Interventions for preventing thrombosis in solid organ transplant recipients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011557.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vignesh Surianarayanan, Thomas J Hoather, Samuel J Tingle, Emily R Thompson, John Hanley, Colin H Wilson |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 46 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 54 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,071,304
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,679
of 12,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,512
of 425,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#135
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.