↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dornase alfa for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
Dornase alfa for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001127.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Connie Yang, Mark Montgomery

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 158 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Researcher 10 6%
Professor 7 4%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 60 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 66 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,314,447
of 21,784,478 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,250
of 12,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,218
of 328,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,784,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.