↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chinese herbal medicine for chronic neck pain due to cervical degenerative disc disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Chinese herbal medicine for chronic neck pain due to cervical degenerative disc disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006556.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xuejun Cui, Kien Trinh, Yong-Jun Wang

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 109 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 20%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 18 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 25 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2016.
All research outputs
#3,650,697
of 12,555,175 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,841
of 10,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,618
of 262,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#116
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,555,175 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.