Title |
Lumbar supports for prevention and treatment of low back pain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001823.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ingrid van Duijvenbode, Petra Jellema, Mireille van Poppel, Maurits W van Tulder |
Abstract |
Lumbar supports are used in the treatment of low-back pain patients, to prevent the onset of low-back pain (primary prevention) or to prevent recurrences of a low-back pain episode (secondary prevention). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 25% |
Japan | 1 | 13% |
France | 1 | 13% |
Canada | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 336 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 54 | 16% |
Student > Master | 51 | 15% |
Other | 31 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 9% |
Researcher | 29 | 8% |
Other | 65 | 19% |
Unknown | 83 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 117 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 6% |
Engineering | 16 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 13 | 4% |
Other | 45 | 13% |
Unknown | 93 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,531,830
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,271
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,476
of 92,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.