| Title |
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus multiple insulin injections for type 1 diabetes mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005103.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie L Misso, Kristine J Egberts, Matthew Page, Denise O'Connor, Jonathan Shaw |
| Abstract |
Type 1 diabetes is a metabolic disorder resulting from a defect in insulin secretion. Onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus may occur at any age and it is one of the most common chronic diseases of childhood and adolescence. Since there are no interventions known to prevent onset, it is vital that effective treatment regimes are available. Glycaemic control is maintained by replacement of insulin and may be in the form of 'conventional' insulin therapy (multiple injections per day) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Ireland | 1 | 17% |
| Colombia | 1 | 17% |
| Comoros | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 3% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 1% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 64 | 84% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 64 | 84% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,191,784
of 23,592,647 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,755
of 12,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,065
of 167,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,592,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.