↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Regular treatment with formoterol and an inhaled corticosteroid versus regular treatment with salmeterol and an inhaled corticosteroid for chronic asthma: serious adverse events

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Regular treatment with formoterol and an inhaled corticosteroid versus regular treatment with salmeterol and an inhaled corticosteroid for chronic asthma: serious adverse events
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007694.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J Cates, Toby J Lasserson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 19%
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 19 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,036,456
of 22,012,190 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,936
of 12,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,966
of 330,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,012,190 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.