The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Insulin detemir versus insulin glargine for type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006383.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sanne G Swinnen<sup>a</sup>, Airin CR Simon<sup>a</sup>, Frits Holleman, Joost B Hoekstra, J Hans DeVries |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 3 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 277 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 16% |
| Researcher | 42 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 61 | 21% |
| Unknown | 65 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 123 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 6% |
| Psychology | 11 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 12% |
| Unknown | 72 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,417,003
of 26,178,577 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,037
of 13,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,486
of 130,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,178,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.