↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Insulin detemir versus insulin glargine for type 2 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Insulin detemir versus insulin glargine for type 2 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006383.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanne G Swinnen, Airin CR Simon, Frits Holleman, Joost B Hoekstra, J Hans DeVries

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 3 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 264 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 17%
Researcher 41 15%
Student > Postgraduate 27 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Other 21 8%
Other 59 22%
Unknown 55 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 5%
Psychology 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 61 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,276,458
of 23,671,454 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,061
of 12,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,258
of 117,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,671,454 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.