↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosing uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in endemic countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
343 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosing uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in endemic countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008122.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharine Abba, Jonathan J Deeks, Piero L Olliaro, Cho-Min Naing, Sally M Jackson, Yemisi Takwoingi, Sarah Donegan, Paul Garner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 336 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 17%
Researcher 53 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 13%
Student > Bachelor 37 11%
Student > Postgraduate 31 9%
Other 76 22%
Unknown 44 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 138 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 5%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Other 67 20%
Unknown 52 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,262,562
of 18,057,469 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,906
of 11,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,284
of 322,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,057,469 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.