↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosing uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in endemic countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
400 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosing uncomplicated <i>P. falciparum</i> malaria in endemic countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008122.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharine Abba, Jonathan J Deeks, Piero L Olliaro, Cho‐Min Naing, Sally M Jackson, Yemisi Takwoingi, Sarah Donegan, Paul Garner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 393 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 15%
Researcher 58 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 12%
Student > Bachelor 40 10%
Student > Postgraduate 32 8%
Other 85 21%
Unknown 77 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 149 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 4%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Other 72 18%
Unknown 87 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,835,465
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,961
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,539
of 127,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.