↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chinese herbal medicine in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Chinese herbal medicine in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006224.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hai Bo Qu, Wang Dengfeng, Taixiang Wu, Jane Marjoribanks, Sun Ying, Jia Haijun, Jing Zhang, Lina Hu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Professor 3 3%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 42 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 43 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2011.
All research outputs
#20,723,696
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,914
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,396
of 127,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.