↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for primary dysmenorrhoea

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
259 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for primary dysmenorrhoea
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002123
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Proctor, Cindy Farquhar, Will Stones, Lin He, Xiaoshu Zhu, Julie Brown

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 365 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 66 18%
Student > Master 54 15%
Student > Postgraduate 29 8%
Researcher 25 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 6%
Other 67 18%
Unknown 109 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 123 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 16%
Psychology 11 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 3%
Neuroscience 8 2%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 115 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2023.
All research outputs
#407,179
of 25,387,189 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#714
of 12,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#430
of 132,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.