↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for primary dysmenorrhoea

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for primary dysmenorrhoea
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002123
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Proctor, Cindy Farquhar, Will Stones, Lin He, Xiaoshu Zhu, Julie Brown

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 254 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 56 22%
Student > Master 44 17%
Student > Postgraduate 24 9%
Researcher 21 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 7%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 47 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Psychology 8 3%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 52 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2017.
All research outputs
#690,675
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,747
of 11,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,735
of 188,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.