↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acupuncture for lateral elbow pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
Title
Acupuncture for lateral elbow pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003527
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally Green, Rachelle Buchbinder, Les Barnsley, Stephen Hall, Millicent White, Nynke Smidt, Willem JJ Assendelft

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 231 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 20%
Student > Bachelor 40 17%
Researcher 27 11%
Other 23 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 8%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 38 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 20%
Sports and Recreations 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 46 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,061,790
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,389
of 12,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,557
of 125,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.