↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acupuncture for lateral elbow pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
Title
Acupuncture for lateral elbow pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003527
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally Green, Rachelle Buchbinder, Les Barnsley, Stephen Hall, Millicent White, Nynke Smidt, Willem JJ Assendelft

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 248 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 18%
Student > Bachelor 39 15%
Researcher 27 11%
Other 21 8%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Other 61 24%
Unknown 44 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 18%
Unspecified 16 6%
Sports and Recreations 8 3%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 52 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,200,179
of 25,391,066 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,539
of 12,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,704
of 131,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.