| Title |
Family-centred care for hospitalised children aged 0-12 years
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004811.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda Shields, Huaqiong Zhou, Jan Pratt, Marjory Taylor, Judith Hunter, Elaine Pascoe |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 543 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 539 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 99 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 70 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 10% |
| Researcher | 51 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 32 | 6% |
| Other | 105 | 19% |
| Unknown | 134 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 133 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 125 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 7% |
| Psychology | 34 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 56 | 10% |
| Unknown | 146 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2016.
All research outputs
#5,490,487
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,357
of 12,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,240
of 175,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#129
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.