↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dynamic compression plating versus locked intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Dynamic compression plating versus locked intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005959.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harish Kurup, Munier Hossain, J Glynne Andrew

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 227 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 16%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Other 21 9%
Student > Postgraduate 20 9%
Other 55 24%
Unknown 43 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Engineering 8 3%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 53 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2011.
All research outputs
#20,660,542
of 25,387,480 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,980
of 12,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,021
of 123,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#87
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,480 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.