↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dynamic compression plating versus locked intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Dynamic compression plating versus locked intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005959.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harish Kurup, Munier Hossain, J Glynne Andrew

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 182 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 16%
Researcher 27 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Other 20 11%
Student > Postgraduate 18 10%
Other 43 23%
Unknown 25 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 34 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2011.
All research outputs
#13,873,923
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,733
of 11,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,896
of 188,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.