↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cardioprotective interventions for cancer patients receiving anthracyclines

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
299 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
388 Mendeley
Title
Cardioprotective interventions for cancer patients receiving anthracyclines
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003917.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elvira C van Dalen, Huib N Caron, Heather O Dickinson, Leontien CM Kremer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 388 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 382 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 14%
Researcher 40 10%
Other 39 10%
Student > Bachelor 39 10%
Student > Postgraduate 30 8%
Other 86 22%
Unknown 98 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 161 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 4%
Other 32 8%
Unknown 113 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,640,840
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,615
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,466
of 128,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#69
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.