The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
International travel‐related control measures to contain the COVID‐19 pandemic: a rapid review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013717.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacob Burns, Ani Movsisyan, Jan M Stratil, Renke Lars Biallas, Michaela Coenen, Karl Mf Emmert-Fees, Karin Geffert, Sabine Hoffmann, Olaf Horstick, Michael Laxy, Carmen Klinger, Suzie Kratzer, Tim Litwin, Susan Norris, Lisa M Pfadenhauer, Peter von Philipsborn, Kerstin Sell, Julia Stadelmaier, Ben Verboom, Stephan Voss, Katharina Wabnitz, Eva Rehfuess |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 58 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 62 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 16% |
| Scientists | 15 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 285 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
| Researcher | 25 | 9% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 14% |
| Unknown | 111 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 50 | 18% |
| Unknown | 122 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2024.
All research outputs
#442,573
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#735
of 13,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,883
of 459,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.