↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Lens extraction for chronic angle‐closure glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Lens extraction for chronic angle‐closure glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005555.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ariel Yuhan Ong, Sueko M Ng, S Swaroop Vedula, David S Friedman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 45 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 32%
Psychology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 53 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,373,497
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,719
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,016
of 453,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.