The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011319.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ahmed Kayssi, Talal Al‐Atassi, George Oreopoulos, Graham Roche‐Nagle, Kong Teng Tan, Dheeraj K Rajan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 292 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 11% |
| Researcher | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 50 | 17% |
| Unknown | 91 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 116 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 11% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 101 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,957,106
of 26,109,760 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,035
of 13,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,203
of 385,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#86
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,109,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.