↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013512.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sueko M Ng, Mark Ren, Kristina B Lindsley, Barbara S Hawkins, Irene C Kuo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#5,538,252
of 18,422,743 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,875
of 11,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,160
of 323,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,422,743 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.