↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transepithelial versus epithelium‐off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Transepithelial versus epithelium‐off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013512.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sueko M Ng, Mark Ren, Kristina B Lindsley, Barbara S Hawkins, Irene C Kuo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Other 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 39 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 49 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,269,515
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,663
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,851
of 458,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.