The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for women at risk during pregnancy and the early postnatal period
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001689.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philippa Middleton, Emily Shepherd, Judith C Gomersall |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Czechia | 1 | 5% |
| Thailand | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 239 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Researcher | 12 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 17% |
| Unknown | 129 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 134 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,627,699
of 26,391,552 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,290
of 13,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,941
of 460,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,391,552 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.