↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
28 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009098.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Santa Cruz, Fernando Villarejo, Celica Irrazabal, Agustín Ciapponi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 12%
Other 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 47 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 49 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,453,203
of 22,577,901 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,367
of 12,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,928
of 334,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,577,901 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.