↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

High versus low positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
27 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
Title
High versus low positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009098.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Santa Cruz, Fernando Villarejo, Celica Irrazabal, Agustín Ciapponi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 200 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 18 9%
Student > Master 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Researcher 11 6%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 87 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Unspecified 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 90 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,584,238
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,382
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,682
of 455,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.