↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012250.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ameer Hohlfeld, Sumayyah Ebrahim, Muhammed Zaki Shaik, Tamara Kredo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 153 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 10 7%
Researcher 6 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 88 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 96 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,734,479
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,300
of 13,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,182
of 458,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#117
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.