↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
Title
Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012250.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ameer Hohlfeld, Sumayyah Ebrahim, Muhammed Zaki Shaik, Tamara Kredo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,242,548
of 17,446,661 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,582
of 11,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,515
of 205,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,446,661 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.