| Title |
Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012250.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ameer Hohlfeld, Sumayyah Ebrahim, Muhammed Zaki Shaik, Tamara Kredo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| South Africa | 2 | 17% |
| Israel | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 138 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 76 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 84 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2021.
All research outputs
#5,528,530
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,757
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,806
of 457,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#112
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.