↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Endothelin receptor antagonists for subarachnoid hemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Endothelin receptor antagonists for subarachnoid hemorrhage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008354.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jia Guo, Zhenghong Shi, KeHu Yang, Jin Hui Tian, Lei Jiang

Abstract

A subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a serious and potentially life-threatening condition where blood leaks out of blood vessels over the surface of the brain. Delayed ischemic neurological deficit (DIND) and the related feature of vasospasm, where patients experience a delayed deterioration, have long been recognized as the leading potentially treatable cause of death and disability in patients with SAH. Endothelin is a potent, long-lasting endogenous vasoconstrictor that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of DIND. Therefore, endothelin receptor antagonists (ETAs) have emerged as a promising therapeutic option for SAH-induced cerebral vasospasm.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 19%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 32 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Neuroscience 9 7%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 33 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2016.
All research outputs
#6,495,301
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,769
of 11,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,991
of 187,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#141
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.