The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Hyperbaric oxygen for carbon monoxide poisoning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002041.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nick A Buckley, David N Juurlink, Geoff Isbister, Michael H Bennett, Eric J Lavonas |
| Abstract |
Poisoning with carbon monoxide (CO) remains an important cause of accidental and intentional injury worldwide. Several unblinded non-randomized trials have suggested that the use of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) prevents the development of neurological sequelae. This has led to the widespread use of HBO in the management of patients with carbon monoxide poisoning. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Qatar | 1 | 7% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 33% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 245 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 31 | 12% |
| Researcher | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 51 | 20% |
| Unknown | 70 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 114 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 78 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#599,401
of 26,414,132 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,001
of 13,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,005
of 123,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,414,132 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.