↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hyperbaric oxygen for carbon monoxide poisoning

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 tweeters
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
234 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
Title
Hyperbaric oxygen for carbon monoxide poisoning
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002041.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nick A Buckley, David N Juurlink, Geoff Isbister, Michael H Bennett, Eric J Lavonas

Abstract

Poisoning with carbon monoxide (CO) remains an important cause of accidental and intentional injury worldwide. Several unblinded non-randomized trials have suggested that the use of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) prevents the development of neurological sequelae. This has led to the widespread use of HBO in the management of patients with carbon monoxide poisoning.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 212 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 13%
Other 28 13%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 46 21%
Unknown 49 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 57 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2021.
All research outputs
#457,290
of 21,339,655 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#917
of 12,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,575
of 177,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,339,655 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,082 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.