↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Primary prevention of variceal bleeding in people with oesophageal varices due to liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Primary prevention of variceal bleeding in people with oesophageal varices due to liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013121.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Davide Roccarina, Lawrence MJ Best, Suzanne C Freeman, Danielle Roberts, Nicola J Cooper, Alex J Sutton, Amine Benmassaoud, Maria Corina Plaz Torres, Laura Iogna Prat, Mario Csenar, Sivapatham Arunan, Tanjia Begum, Elisabeth Jane Milne, Maxine Tapp, Chavdar S Pavlov, Brian R Davidson, Emmanuel Tsochatzis, Norman R Williams, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,659,652
of 17,446,661 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,054
of 11,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,481
of 193,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,446,661 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.