↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Bed sharing versus no bed sharing for healthy term neonates

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
28 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Bed sharing versus no bed sharing for healthy term neonates
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012866.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rashmi R Das, Mari Jeeva Sankar, Ramesh Agarwal

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Librarian 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 23%
Social Sciences 3 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Psychology 3 12%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,072,548
of 18,240,594 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,707
of 11,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,247
of 326,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,240,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.