The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Long versus short course treatment with metformin and clomiphene citrate for ovulation induction in women with PCOS
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006226.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Supat Sinawat, Pranom Buppasiri, Pisake Lumbiganon, Porjai Pattanittum |
Abstract |
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrinopathy among reproductive-aged women. Apart from infertility, women with PCOS often have other endocrine disorders, including insulin resistance, hyperinsulinaemia and hyperandrogenism. Metformin,combined with clomiphene citrate (CC), has been shown to be more effective in ovulation induction when compared with clomiphene citrate alone. The optimal duration for metformin pretreatment before initiation of clomiphene citrate, however, is unknown. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 20% |
Jamaica | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
Researcher | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 18% |
Unknown | 30 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 32 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,240,192
of 26,408,935 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,494
of 13,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,820
of 195,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,408,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.