↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing nausea and vomiting in women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for preventing nausea and vomiting in women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007579.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

James D Griffiths, Gillian ML Gyte, Shantini Paranjothy, Heather C Brown, Hannah K Broughton, Jane Thomas

Abstract

Nausea and vomiting are distressing symptoms which are experienced commonly during caesarean section under regional anaesthesia and can also occur in the period following the procedure. 

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Turkey 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 209 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 22%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Other 14 6%
Other 48 22%
Unknown 36 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Psychology 14 6%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 41 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,651,521
of 16,737,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,271
of 11,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,234
of 157,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,737,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.