| Title |
Progestogens for preventing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013792.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam J Devall, Argyro Papadopoulou, Marcelina Podesek, David M Haas, Malcolm J Price, Arri Coomarasamy, Ioannis D Gallos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 38% |
| United States | 4 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 55 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 58 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2022.
All research outputs
#930,763
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,015
of 12,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,476
of 435,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.