| Title |
Cycled light in the intensive care unit for preterm and low birth weight infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006982.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Iris Morag, Arne Ohlsson<sup>a</sup> |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 435 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 433 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 59 | 14% |
| Researcher | 51 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 9% |
| Other | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 69 | 16% |
| Unknown | 149 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 68 | 16% |
| Psychology | 15 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 59 | 14% |
| Unknown | 158 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,390,825
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,937
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,605
of 377,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.